Ohhh man this is funny....
Went to the sites of the filter makers K&N and S&B... At least K&N is honest about the
whole situation. From their site:
"As has become customary in the automotive industry, we use Coarse Test Dust for gasoline
engine air filters and Fine Test Dust for diesel engine air filters. This practice of using different
grades of test dust developed because Diesel engines require higher levels of filtration because
they operate at much higher compression and require finer tolerances than Gasoline engines. "
K&N Air Filter Efficiency Testing
OK, so they test with the correct dust and they say so. The results can be as bad as
96% efficient and they say so....
NOW.... go to the S&B site....
They say that they are 99.47% efficient, and stock is 99.82%(paper filter).... Well take
a look at how they are testing... "PTI ISO Course Test Dust was utilized "... Yep that
is right, they test with COURSE DUST. They are less efficient than stock even when
tested with a dust that is the wrong makeup for a diesel.
http://www.sbfilters.com/pdf/iso_5011_2927_ISO 5011 Test Results for 75-5028.pdf
Wonder how bad it would be is they used the correct dust? I would think it would
be as bad as K&N...
Now these filters have a place, and it is in the racing world where the engine only
has to last to the end of the race. You do not care if the engine is wasted at the
end of the race, you just need to get there to win.... Gonna risk that $10,000 diesel
on a oil/gauze filter to race to the store and get beer?? Not me...