Hoss 350
My GSP, Dutch
We already do. Some areas do not, but I take my truck in to get sniffed every two years.j.j said:Well are we going to be getting smogged in some sort of way in the future?
I assume you're talking about disabling/removing the restrictive emissions equipment? It won't be quite so easy as gutting the cat was on pre-07 trucks. Particulate filters require PCM monitoring, have their own fuel line and injector, and sometimes even a spark plug to ignite the regen cycle. To remove the PM filter, then, you will have codes from the monitors not monitoring properly, an injector that you would have to re-route back to the fuel tank so it fired back into the tank (really the only way i can see it, maybe other ideas will come up some day), and possibly othther things to re-route, fake in, and lie to to get the truck to not throw codes and operate properly. On top of that, the PM filter costs LOTS of money (I've heard 3K) so it isn't like you'll want to wreck it, just in case you ever have to put it back on.With these new motors needing to make so much power to compensate for the restrictions in their exhaust/computers/etc, as long as we dont get smogged, those engines would be insane with the mods that some of us already perform on our motors, right?
The new EGR systems that I've seen proposed are not just little add-on valves that you can disconnect and call it good. They are integral with the engine, to the point of having ports in the heads specifically for EGR.
So, I'm guessing that disabling the new emissions equipment is going to be a lot more difficult than in years past. Normally, i would be chastizing for the idea of removing emissions equipment, but since no one has ever shown that PM is harmful in any way at the levels produced by diesel engines, and that NOx may very well not be as bad as we thought way back when (areas with higher NOx levels can have LESS smog, so it seems that there is more to it than we understand at the moment...) I am kind of on the fence here, since the trade off for reducing pollutants we cannot even prove are trouble, we are reducing fuel economy, which i think is the more important issue in this day and age. Just my .02. I'm sure there are much smarter men than me running things up there at EPA, who would probably laugh at me for saying what I just said, but that still doesn't help me understand why we are sacrificing fuel economy for EXTREMELY diminished returns in pollution control.