95_stroker
Jefe
WOW Stroker.. I meant no personal Harm nor Foul.
No worries Joe, none taken at all. I enjoy good debate as much as the next guy as long as its built on truth.
I don't recall the exact numbers but it was 50+ MPGs for the trip. They claimed that with further testing, design and development.. their concept, they felt, was capable of 120 MPG >in some applications< >IF< America was willing to step away from the "Muscle Car" and the "Boat Sized Tanks".
I hate to snip the rest of your post as it was good but you hit it right here with the text I bold/italicized.
Fast forward to Y-2008. Have we stepped aside from our muscle car and boat sized tanks yet? Which of the Big 3 doesnt have a muscle car in the line up? Which of the Big 3 arent playing to the heart strings of the Baby Boomers who WANT those muscle cars? Cripes the Big 3 are making the muscle cars LOOK like they did in the late 60's early 70's. Which of the Big 3 isnt offering a ridiculously appointed over sized testosterone laden diesel pickup today that is capable of equal to or more than most medium duty and some SEMI's could handle 40 years ago?
Now, I ask 1 final question for you to answer (or anybody, this isnt a personal shot at you Joe ), who has asked for this stuff and why is the Big 3 providing it?-popcorn